Shark FlexStyle vs Dyson Airwrap: The Ultimate Hair Tool Showdown
Shark FlexStyle vs Dyson Airwrap
Dive into the “FlexStyle vs Airwrap” debate. Compare design, features, results, and decide which hair styling tool is perfect for you.
Some links to purchase are affiliate.
In the ever-evolving world of hair styling tools, two products have emerged as top contenders for those seeking salon-quality results at home: the Shark FlexStyle and the Dyson Airwrap. The dilemma many face is determining which tool to invest in. Both are an investment. We delve deep into the features, design, and results to give you the definitive comparison Shark FlexStyle vs Dyson Airwrap.
Quick Rating Rundown
What is Shark FlexStyle?
The Shark FlexStyle is more than just a hair dryer. It’s a transformative tool that can rotate between being a powerful, fast, no-heat-damage hair dryer and an ultra-versatile multi-styler. It offers a range of attachments designed to curl, volumize, smooth, and dry your hair without causing heat damage. From its unique Coanda Technology auto-wrap curlers to its rotatable styling concentrator, the Shark FlexStyle is all about providing versatility and power without compromising on hair health.
What is Dyson Airwrap?
The Dyson Airwrap, renowned for its advanced technology and design, harnesses the Coanda airflow phenomenon to attract and wrap hair around its barrels or onto its brushes and attachments. This multi-styler not only styles but also dries simultaneously without resorting to extreme heat. The re-engineered attachments with Enhanced Coanda airflow offer increased control, making the Airwrap a versatile choice for various hair types and styles.
Difference in Design
Both tools are cutting-edge, aerodynamically driven styling systems. While Dyson Airwrap has always been a front-runner in innovative design, vs Shark flexstyle took a strategic approach by letting Dyson pave the way and capitalizing on existing designs. This approach has enabled Shark to offer competitive tools at a more affordable price point by allocating fewer resources to research and development.
Difference in Features
While Dyson prides itself on its powerful motor and innovative attachments (recently being the first to introduce features like the dual-direction curling barrel and the flyaway smoother), Shark has a few tricks up its sleeve. Notably, Shark’s FlexStyle boasts a superior heat monitoring system that regulates temperatures a staggering 1,000 times per second, ensuring consistent air temperature and minimizing heat exposure. In contrast, Dyson’s system measures temperature 40 times per second. The ergonomic design of Shark also gives it an edge, offering ease of use, especially when reaching the back of the head.
List of Attachments – Shark FlexStyle vs Dyson Airwrap
Dyson Airwrap:
- Dyson Barrels
- 0.8 inch barrel – for longer lasting curls in fine hair and tighter curls for all hair types
- 1.2 inch barrel – creates voluminous curls in both directions; Comes in both short and long barrel size for short to medium and long hair.
- 1.6 inch barrel – creates loose, bouncy curls and waves in both directions; Comes in both short and long barrel size for short to medium and long hair
- Dyson Brushes
- Soft Smoothing Brush – shapes fine hair with increased control for straight styles (also comes in small size)
- Firm Smoothing Brush – smoothes frizz-prone hair using firm bristles for straighter styles (also comes in small size)
- Round Volumizing Brush – long, fine bristles direct air deep into the hair to give body, creating tension to shape hair as it dries (also comes in small size)
- Dyson Hair Dryers
- The Coanda smoothing dryer attachment dries, smooths, and hides flyaways.
- For curly and coily hair, the wide-tooth comb attachment shapes and lengthens hair as it dries.
Shark FlexStyle:
- Dryers
- Styling Concentrator – rotatable nozzle to style and dry
- Curl-Defining Diffuser – defines natural curls with fast, even drying from roots to tips; Extendable prongs add volume to any hair length
- Barrels
- 1.25 inch auto-wrap curlers (2 that rotate in different directions)
- 0.95 inch auto-wrap curlers (2 that rotate in different directions)
- Brushes
- Oval Brush – increases smoothness and decreases frizz while adding volume and bounce
- Paddle Brush – dries, straightens, and smooths hair
- Round Brush – dries and styles for increased shine and volume; Features smoothing and nylon boar bristles to detangle, grab, smooth, and defrizz hair
- Combs
- Wide-tooth Comb – best for coily and curly hair types; Two rows with two lengths of teeth stretch and lengthen natural curls from root to tip
Difference in Results – Shark FlexStyle vs Dyson Airwrap
When it comes to the end results, both tools produce remarkably similar outcomes. However, the Coanda effect seems stronger on Dyson’s attachments, which might lead to more voluminous curls or waves. Conversely, with the Shark FlexStyle, users might find more consistency in curls, especially at the back of the head, due to its ergonomic design.
Who is Dyson Airwrap for?
The Dyson Airwrap is for those who prioritize innovative features, powerful performance, and a wide variety of attachments. It’s suitable for individuals who frequently change their hairstyles and want a tool that offers a range of possibilities.
Who is Shark FlexStyle for?
Shark FlexStyle is designed for those who value ergonomics, consistent results, and advanced temperature regulation. It’s perfect for individuals looking for a balance between affordability and top-tier performance.
Conclusion – Shark FlexStyle vs Dyson Airwrap
While the battle of “Shark FlexStyle vs Dyson Airwrap” doesn’t produce a clear winner, it offers consumers the choice based on their preferences and needs. Both tools are commendable in their performance, with each bringing unique features to the table. Whether you value innovation, ergonomics, or affordability, the choice between these two heavyweights ultimately boils down to individual needs and hair styling goals.
Edited by Milabu